Compare/GLM-4.5-Air vs QwQ 32B

GLM-4.5-AirvsQwQ 32B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Z AI

GLM-4.5-Air

Input
$0.17/M
Output
$0.98/M
Speed
63 tok/s
TTFT
1.66s
Alibaba

QwQ 32B

Input
$0.66/M
Output
$1/M
Speed
31 tok/s
TTFT
0.47s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
GLM-4.5-Air
Faster (tok/s)
GLM-4.5-Air
Lower Latency
QwQ 32B
Benchmarks (9-3)
GLM-4.5-Air

Pricing Comparison

MetricGLM-4.5-AirQwQ 32B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.17$0.66
Output ($/M tokens)$0.98$1
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
GLM-4.5-Air$0.27
QwQ 32B$0.76

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
GLM-4.5-Air
63 tok/s
QwQ 32B
31 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
GLM-4.5-Air
1.66s
QwQ 32B
0.47s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
23.219.7
Coding Index
23.8
Math Index
80.729.0
GPQA Diamond
73.3%59.3%
MMLU-Pro
81.5%76.4%
LiveCodeBench
68.4%63.1%
AIME 2025
80.7%29.0%
MATH-500
96.5%95.7%
Humanity's Last Exam
6.8%8.2%
SciCode
30.6%35.8%
IFBench
37.6%38.8%
TerminalBench
20.5%
GLM-4.5-Air9 wins
3 winsQwQ 32B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5-Air or QwQ 32B?

GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.37/M tokens vs $0.74/M for QwQ 32B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GLM-4.5-Air wins 9 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for QwQ 32B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

GLM-4.5-Air generates tokens faster at 63 tok/s vs 31 tok/s. However, QwQ 32B has lower time-to-first-token (0.47s vs 1.66s).

When should I use GLM-4.5-Air vs QwQ 32B?

Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.5-Air for lower cost, GLM-4.5-Air for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.5-Air for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.