Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.6 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.8 | $1.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 69 tok/s vs 42 tok/s. However, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.68s vs 26.97s).
Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.