Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.3 | $0.4 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.9 | $0.89 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.45/M tokens vs $0.63/M for DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24).
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 23 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 1.01s).
Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) for lower cost, GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.