Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.07 | $0.13 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.4 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.15/M tokens vs $0.20/M for Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning).
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 111 tok/s vs 65 tok/s. However, Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.69s vs 1.23s).
Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.