Compare/GLM-5.2 (max) vs o4-mini (high)

GLM-5.2 (max)vso4-mini (high)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Z AI

GLM-5.2 (max)

Input
$1.4/M
Output
$4.4/M
Speed
112 tok/s
TTFT
2.13s
OpenAI

o4-mini (high)

Input
$1.1/M
Output
$4.4/M
Speed
184 tok/s
TTFT
23.13s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
o4-mini (high)
Faster (tok/s)
o4-mini (high)
Lower Latency
GLM-5.2 (max)
Benchmarks (7-5)
GLM-5.2 (max)

Pricing Comparison

MetricGLM-5.2 (max)o4-mini (high)
Input ($/M tokens)$1.4$1.1
Output ($/M tokens)$4.4$4.4
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
GLM-5.2 (max)$1.84
o4-mini (high)$1.54

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
GLM-5.2 (max)
112 tok/s
o4-mini (high)
184 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
GLM-5.2 (max)
2.13s
o4-mini (high)
23.13s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
50.725.6
Coding Index
50.725.6
Math Index
90.7
GPQA Diamond
89.5%78.4%
MMLU-Pro
83.2%
LiveCodeBench
85.9%
AIME 2025
90.7%
MATH-500
98.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
40.1%17.5%
SciCode
50.5%46.5%
IFBench
73.3%68.7%
TerminalBench
50.8%15.2%
GLM-5.2 (max)7 wins
5 winso4-mini (high)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 (max) or o4-mini (high)?

o4-mini (high) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.93/M tokens vs $2.15/M for GLM-5.2 (max).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GLM-5.2 (max) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for o4-mini (high). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o4-mini (high) generates tokens faster at 184 tok/s vs 112 tok/s. GLM-5.2 (max) also has lower time-to-first-token (2.13s vs 23.13s).

When should I use GLM-5.2 (max) vs o4-mini (high)?

Choose based on your priorities: o4-mini (high) for lower cost, GLM-5.2 (max) for stronger benchmark performance, and o4-mini (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.