Compare/GLM-5.3-Flash vs Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)

GLM-5.3-FlashvsGrok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Z AI

GLM-5.3-Flash

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.5/M
Speed
47 tok/s
TTFT
1.67s
SpaceXAI

Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.2/M
Output
$0.5/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
GLM-5.3-Flash
Faster (tok/s)
GLM-5.3-Flash
Lower Latency
GLM-5.3-Flash
Benchmarks (2-0)
GLM-5.3-Flash

Pricing Comparison

MetricGLM-5.3-FlashGrok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.15$0.2
Output ($/M tokens)$0.5$0.5
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
GLM-5.3-Flash$0.20
Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)$0.25

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
GLM-5.3-Flash
47 tok/s
Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
GLM-5.3-Flash
1.67s
Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. GLM-5.3-Flash wins the overall benchmark matchup 2–0 across 2 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning) is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning) makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. GLM-5.3-Flash is strongest on Coding Index (71.5), Intelligence Index (57.5). Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning) leads on Intelligence Index (16.6).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Z AI and SpaceXAI sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Z AI tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while SpaceXAI often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): GLM-5.3-Flash costs $12.00 ($144/year); Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning) costs $13.50 ($162/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): GLM-5.3-Flash ≈ $1.75/run, Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning) ≈ $2.00/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): GLM-5.3-Flash ≈ $80/run, Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning) ≈ $90/run. GLM-5.3-Flash becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
57.516.6
Coding Index
71.5
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
GLM-5.3-Flash2 wins
0 winsGrok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)?

GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.24/M tokens vs $0.28/M for Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GLM-5.3-Flash wins 2 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

GLM-5.3-Flash generates tokens faster at 47 tok/s vs — tok/s. GLM-5.3-Flash also has lower time-to-first-token (1.67s vs —s).

When should I use GLM-5.3-Flash vs Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: GLM-5.3-Flash for lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-5.3-Flash for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.