Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-5 (Reasoning) | Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $1 | $1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $3.2 | $3 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.50/M tokens vs $1.55/M for GLM-5 (Reasoning).
GLM-5 (Reasoning) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GLM-5 (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 47 tok/s vs 39 tok/s. However, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.76s vs 1.08s).
Choose based on your priorities: Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, GLM-5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-5 (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.