Advertisement
Compare/GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Plus

GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)vsQwen3.5 Omni Plus

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Z AI

GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)

Input
—
Output
—
Speed
—
TTFT
—
Alibaba

Qwen3.5 Omni Plus

Input
$0.4/M
Output
$4.8/M
Speed
99 tok/s
TTFT
2.14s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Lower Latency
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Benchmarks (1-0)
GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricGLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Input ($/M tokens)—$0.4
Output ($/M tokens)—$4.8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus$0.88

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)
—
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
99 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)
—
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
2.14s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) wins the overall benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Pricing varies significantly between these models — check the table above for the exact per-token rates. Many production workloads actually surface input-token cost (retrieval-augmented prompts, code-context windows), so factor both directions.

Strengths. GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) is strongest on Intelligence Index (23.5). Qwen3.5 Omni Plus leads on Intelligence Index (20.4).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Z AI and Alibaba sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Z AI tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Alibaba often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
23.520.4
Coding Index
——
Math Index
——
GPQA Diamond
——
MMLU-Pro
——
LiveCodeBench
——
AIME 2025
——
MATH-500
——
Humanity's Last Exam
——
SciCode
——
IFBench
——
TerminalBench
——
GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)1 wins
0 winsQwen3.5 Omni Plus

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) or Qwen3.5 Omni Plus?

Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.50/M tokens vs $—/M for GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Qwen3.5 Omni Plus. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3.5 Omni Plus generates tokens faster at 99 tok/s vs — tok/s. However, Qwen3.5 Omni Plus has lower time-to-first-token (2.14s vs —s).

When should I use GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Plus?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 Omni Plus for lower cost, GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 Omni Plus for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.