Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 nano | Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.1 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.4 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for GPT-4.1 nano. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GPT-4.1 nano generates tokens faster at 159 tok/s vs 51 tok/s. However, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.25s vs 0.45s).
Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GPT-4.1 nano for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.