Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $1.75 | $3 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $14 | $15 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $4.81/M tokens vs $6.00/M for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort).
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 63 tok/s vs 50 tok/s. GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.63s vs 1.21s).
Choose based on your priorities: GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) for stronger benchmark performance, and GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.