Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $5 | $5 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $30 | $25 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $10.00/M tokens vs $11.25/M for GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning).
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) wins 9 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 60 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 9.16s).
Choose based on your priorities: Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) for lower cost, Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.