Compare/GPT-5 mini (high) vs MiMo-V2-Omni-0327

GPT-5 mini (high)vsMiMo-V2-Omni-0327

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

OpenAI

GPT-5 mini (high)

Input
$0.25/M
Output
$2/M
Speed
95 tok/s
TTFT
95.85s
Xiaomi

MiMo-V2-Omni-0327

Input
$0.4/M
Output
$2/M
Speed
109 tok/s
TTFT
1.36s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
GPT-5 mini (high)
Faster (tok/s)
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327
Lower Latency
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327
Benchmarks (5-6)
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-5 mini (high)MiMo-V2-Omni-0327
Input ($/M tokens)$0.25$0.4
Output ($/M tokens)$2$2
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
GPT-5 mini (high)$0.45
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327$0.60

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
GPT-5 mini (high)
95 tok/s
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327
109 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
GPT-5 mini (high)
95.85s
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327
1.36s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
41.244.9
Coding Index
35.336.9
Math Index
90.7
GPQA Diamond
82.8%85.5%
MMLU-Pro
83.7%
LiveCodeBench
83.8%
AIME 2025
90.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
19.7%20.4%
SciCode
39.2%39.5%
IFBench
75.4%67.3%
TerminalBench
33.3%35.6%
GPT-5 mini (high)5 wins
6 winsMiMo-V2-Omni-0327

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 mini (high) or MiMo-V2-Omni-0327?

GPT-5 mini (high) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.69/M tokens vs $0.80/M for MiMo-V2-Omni-0327.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for GPT-5 mini (high). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 generates tokens faster at 109 tok/s vs 95 tok/s. However, MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 has lower time-to-first-token (1.36s vs 95.85s).

When should I use GPT-5 mini (high) vs MiMo-V2-Omni-0327?

Choose based on your priorities: GPT-5 mini (high) for lower cost, MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 for stronger benchmark performance, and MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.