Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | gpt-oss-20B (high) | Qwen2.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.06 | $0.05 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.2 | $0.2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen2.5 Turbo is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.09/M tokens vs $0.09/M for gpt-oss-20B (high).
gpt-oss-20B (high) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Qwen2.5 Turbo. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
gpt-oss-20B (high) generates tokens faster at 316 tok/s vs 68 tok/s. gpt-oss-20B (high) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.41s vs 1.06s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen2.5 Turbo for lower cost, gpt-oss-20B (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and gpt-oss-20B (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.