Compare/Granite 4.1 8B vs LFM2 24B A2B

Granite 4.1 8BvsLFM2 24B A2B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

IBM

Granite 4.1 8B

Input
$0.05/M
Output
$0.1/M
Speed
129 tok/s
TTFT
0.47s
Liquid AI

LFM2 24B A2B

Input
$0.03/M
Output
$0.12/M
Speed
142 tok/s
TTFT
0.29s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
LFM2 24B A2B
Faster (tok/s)
LFM2 24B A2B
Lower Latency
LFM2 24B A2B
Benchmarks (3-3)
Tie

Pricing Comparison

MetricGranite 4.1 8BLFM2 24B A2B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.05$0.03
Output ($/M tokens)$0.1$0.12
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Granite 4.1 8B$0.06
LFM2 24B A2B$0.04

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Granite 4.1 8B
129 tok/s
LFM2 24B A2B
142 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Granite 4.1 8B
0.47s
LFM2 24B A2B
0.29s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
12.410.5
Coding Index
7.33.6
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
43.3%47.4%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
3.8%4.4%
SciCode
21.8%10.9%
IFBench
38.6%45.9%
TerminalBench
0.0%0.0%
Granite 4.1 8B3 wins
3 winsLFM2 24B A2B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.1 8B or LFM2 24B A2B?

LFM2 24B A2B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.05/M tokens vs $0.06/M for Granite 4.1 8B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

It's a tie — both models win 3 benchmarks each across 12 evaluated categories. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

LFM2 24B A2B generates tokens faster at 142 tok/s vs 129 tok/s. However, LFM2 24B A2B has lower time-to-first-token (0.29s vs 0.47s).

When should I use Granite 4.1 8B vs LFM2 24B A2B?

Choose based on your priorities: LFM2 24B A2B for lower cost, both perform similarly on benchmarks, and LFM2 24B A2B for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.