Compare/Grok 4.3 (high) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Grok 4.3 (high)vsGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

SpaceXAI

Grok 4.3 (high)

Input
$1.25/M
Output
$2.5/M
Speed
146 tok/s
TTFT
20.94s
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Input
$0.3/M
Output
$2.5/M
Speed
332 tok/s
TTFT
9.76s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Faster (tok/s)
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Lower Latency
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Benchmarks (1-1)
Tie

Pricing Comparison

MetricGrok 4.3 (high)Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input ($/M tokens)$1.25$0.3
Output ($/M tokens)$2.5$2.5
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Grok 4.3 (high)$1.50
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.55

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Grok 4.3 (high)
146 tok/s
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
332 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Grok 4.3 (high)
20.94s
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
9.76s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Grok 4.3 (high) and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite split the benchmark comparison evenly at 1–1. The tiebreaker here is price, speed, and what you actually run them on.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Grok 4.3 (high) is strongest on Coding Index (42.2), Intelligence Index (37.9). Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads on Coding Index (49.3), Intelligence Index (37.4).

Speed. On throughput, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite generates tokens at 332 tok/s versus 146 tok/s — about 56% faster. On time-to-first-token, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite responds in 9760ms vs 20940ms, which matters most for chat-style UIs.

Provider. SpaceXAI and Google sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: SpaceXAI tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Google often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Grok 4.3 (high) costs $75.00 ($900/year); Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $46.50 ($558/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Grok 4.3 (high) ≈ $11.25/run, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ≈ $6.50/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Grok 4.3 (high) ≈ $500/run, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ≈ $310/run. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Head-to-head deltas

  • Benchmark wins tie exactly at 1–1. The tiebreaker on raw benchmark parity will be price, speed, or capability coverage.
  • On throughput, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 2.28× faster (332 tok/s vs 146 tok/s). For streaming chat or real-time agents this alone often flips the recommendation.
  • Aggregate benchmark score (sum across 12 categories, capped at 100): Grok 4.3 (high) = 80, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite = 87. Within 15% — effectively equivalent if both meet the threshold your product requires.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
37.937.4
Coding Index
42.249.3
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Grok 4.3 (high)1 wins
1 winsGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 (high) or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.85/M tokens vs $1.56/M for Grok 4.3 (high).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

It's a tie — both models win 1 benchmarks each across 12 evaluated categories. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite generates tokens faster at 332 tok/s vs 146 tok/s. However, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has lower time-to-first-token (9.76s vs 20.94s).

When should I use Grok 4.3 (high) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Choose based on your priorities: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for lower cost, both perform similarly on benchmarks, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.