Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) | Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.13 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.4 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.17/M tokens vs $0.20/M for Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning).
Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 81 tok/s vs 51 tok/s. However, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.23s vs 0.58s).
Choose based on your priorities: Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.