Compare/Kimi K2 vs Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)

Kimi K2vsQwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Kimi

Kimi K2

Input
$0.57/M
Output
$2.4/M
Speed
47 tok/s
TTFT
0.86s
Alibaba

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.3/M
Output
$2.4/M
Speed
91 tok/s
TTFT
1.32s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
Kimi K2
Benchmarks (5-7)
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricKimi K2Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.57$0.3
Output ($/M tokens)$2.4$2.4
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Kimi K2$0.81
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)$0.54

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Kimi K2
47 tok/s
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
91 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Kimi K2
0.86s
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
1.32s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
26.337.2
Coding Index
22.133.4
Math Index
57.0
GPQA Diamond
76.6%84.2%
MMLU-Pro
82.4%
LiveCodeBench
55.6%
AIME 2025
57.0%
MATH-500
97.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
7.0%13.2%
SciCode
34.5%36.7%
IFBench
41.5%46.9%
TerminalBench
15.9%31.8%
Kimi K25 wins
7 winsQwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 or Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.82/M tokens vs $1.00/M for Kimi K2.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Kimi K2. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 91 tok/s vs 47 tok/s. Kimi K2 also has lower time-to-first-token (0.86s vs 1.32s).

When should I use Kimi K2 vs Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.