Compare/LFM2 24B A2B vs Granite 4.1 8B

LFM2 24B A2BvsGranite 4.1 8B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Liquid AI

LFM2 24B A2B

Input
$0.03/M
Output
$0.12/M
Speed
230 tok/s
TTFT
0.29s
IBM

Granite 4.1 8B

Input
$0.05/M
Output
$0.1/M
Speed
128 tok/s
TTFT
0.42s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
LFM2 24B A2B
Faster (tok/s)
LFM2 24B A2B
Lower Latency
LFM2 24B A2B
Benchmarks (3-3)
Tie

Pricing Comparison

MetricLFM2 24B A2BGranite 4.1 8B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.03$0.05
Output ($/M tokens)$0.12$0.1
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
LFM2 24B A2B$0.04
Granite 4.1 8B$0.06

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
LFM2 24B A2B
230 tok/s
Granite 4.1 8B
128 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
LFM2 24B A2B
0.29s
Granite 4.1 8B
0.42s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
10.512.4
Coding Index
3.67.3
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
47.4%43.3%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
4.4%3.8%
SciCode
10.9%21.8%
IFBench
45.9%38.6%
TerminalBench
0.0%0.0%
LFM2 24B A2B3 wins
3 winsGranite 4.1 8B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LFM2 24B A2B or Granite 4.1 8B?

LFM2 24B A2B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.05/M tokens vs $0.06/M for Granite 4.1 8B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

It's a tie — both models win 3 benchmarks each across 12 evaluated categories. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

LFM2 24B A2B generates tokens faster at 230 tok/s vs 128 tok/s. LFM2 24B A2B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.29s vs 0.42s).

When should I use LFM2 24B A2B vs Granite 4.1 8B?

Choose based on your priorities: LFM2 24B A2B for lower cost, both perform similarly on benchmarks, and LFM2 24B A2B for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.