Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | LFM2 24B A2B | HyperNova 60B 2605 |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.03 | $0.04 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.12 | $0.14 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
LFM2 24B A2B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.05/M tokens vs $0.07/M for HyperNova 60B 2605.
HyperNova 60B 2605 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for LFM2 24B A2B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
HyperNova 60B 2605 generates tokens faster at 355 tok/s vs 126 tok/s. LFM2 24B A2B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.33s vs 0.76s).
Choose based on your priorities: LFM2 24B A2B for lower cost, HyperNova 60B 2605 for stronger benchmark performance, and HyperNova 60B 2605 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.