Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | LFM2 24B A2B | Sarvam 30B (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.03 | $0.026 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.12 | $0.11 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Sarvam 30B (high) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.05/M tokens vs $0.05/M for LFM2 24B A2B.
Sarvam 30B (high) wins 5 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for LFM2 24B A2B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Sarvam 30B (high) generates tokens faster at 232 tok/s vs 126 tok/s. LFM2 24B A2B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.33s vs 1.16s).
Choose based on your priorities: Sarvam 30B (high) for lower cost, Sarvam 30B (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and Sarvam 30B (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.