Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Ling-flash-2.0 | gpt-oss-120B (low) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.14 | $0.15 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.57 | $0.6 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.25/M tokens vs $0.26/M for gpt-oss-120B (low).
gpt-oss-120B (low) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Ling-flash-2.0. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
gpt-oss-120B (low) generates tokens faster at 255 tok/s vs 64 tok/s. However, gpt-oss-120B (low) has lower time-to-first-token (0.51s vs 1.43s).
Choose based on your priorities: Ling-flash-2.0 for lower cost, gpt-oss-120B (low) for stronger benchmark performance, and gpt-oss-120B (low) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.