Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) | DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.56 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.8 | $1.68 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.84/M tokens vs $0.90/M for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning).
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 52 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.71s).
Choose based on your priorities: DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.