Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) | GLM-4.5V (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.6 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.8 | $1.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for GLM-4.5V (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GLM-4.5V (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 56 tok/s vs 42 tok/s. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.68s vs 0.98s).
Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.5V (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.