Compare/Llama 3 Instruct 8B vs Ministral 3 8B

Llama 3 Instruct 8BvsMinistral 3 8B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Meta

Llama 3 Instruct 8B

Input
$0.04/M
Output
$0.14/M
Speed
TTFT
Mistral

Ministral 3 8B

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.15/M
Speed
120 tok/s
TTFT
0.76s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Llama 3 Instruct 8B
Faster (tok/s)
Ministral 3 8B
Lower Latency
Ministral 3 8B
Benchmarks (0-2)
Ministral 3 8B

Pricing Comparison

MetricLlama 3 Instruct 8BMinistral 3 8B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.04$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0.14$0.15
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Llama 3 Instruct 8B$0.05
Ministral 3 8B$0.16

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Llama 3 Instruct 8B
Ministral 3 8B
120 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Llama 3 Instruct 8B
Ministral 3 8B
0.76s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Ministral 3 8B takes the aggregate benchmark matchup 2–0 across 2 categories. Real workloads usually care about a handful of specific tasks — see the per-benchmark table above.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 0.9× the per-million-token cost, Llama 3 Instruct 8B is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Llama 3 Instruct 8B makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Llama 3 Instruct 8B is strongest on Intelligence Index (1.0). Ministral 3 8B leads on Coding Index (9.7), Intelligence Index (9.0).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Meta and Mistral sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Meta tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Mistral often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Llama 3 Instruct 8B costs $3.30 ($40/year); Ministral 3 8B costs $6.75 ($81/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Llama 3 Instruct 8B ≈ $0.48/run, Ministral 3 8B ≈ $1.05/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Llama 3 Instruct 8B ≈ $22/run, Ministral 3 8B ≈ $45/run. Llama 3 Instruct 8B becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
1.09.0
Coding Index
9.7
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Llama 3 Instruct 8B0 wins
2 winsMinistral 3 8B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3 Instruct 8B or Ministral 3 8B?

Llama 3 Instruct 8B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.07/M tokens vs $0.15/M for Ministral 3 8B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Ministral 3 8B wins 2 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Llama 3 Instruct 8B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Ministral 3 8B generates tokens faster at 120 tok/s vs — tok/s. However, Ministral 3 8B has lower time-to-first-token (0.76s vs —s).

When should I use Llama 3 Instruct 8B vs Ministral 3 8B?

Choose based on your priorities: Llama 3 Instruct 8B for lower cost, Ministral 3 8B for stronger benchmark performance, and Ministral 3 8B for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.