Compare/Llama 3 Instruct 8B vs Nova Micro

Llama 3 Instruct 8BvsNova Micro

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Meta

Llama 3 Instruct 8B

Input
$0.04/M
Output
$0.14/M
Speed
TTFT
Amazon

Nova Micro

Input
$0.04/M
Output
$0.14/M
Speed
282 tok/s
TTFT
0.87s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Nova Micro
Lower Latency
Nova Micro
Benchmarks (0-1)
Nova Micro

Pricing Comparison

MetricLlama 3 Instruct 8BNova Micro
Input ($/M tokens)$0.04$0.04
Output ($/M tokens)$0.14$0.14
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Llama 3 Instruct 8B$0.05
Nova Micro$0.05

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Llama 3 Instruct 8B
Nova Micro
282 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Llama 3 Instruct 8B
Nova Micro
0.87s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Nova Micro takes the aggregate benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 categories. Real workloads usually care about a handful of specific tasks — see the per-benchmark table above.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Nova Micro is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Nova Micro makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Llama 3 Instruct 8B is strongest on Intelligence Index (1.0). Nova Micro leads on Intelligence Index (4.4).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Meta and Amazon sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Meta tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Amazon often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Llama 3 Instruct 8B costs $3.30 ($40/year); Nova Micro costs $3.30 ($40/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Llama 3 Instruct 8B ≈ $0.48/run, Nova Micro ≈ $0.48/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Llama 3 Instruct 8B ≈ $22/run, Nova Micro ≈ $22/run.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
1.04.4
Coding Index
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Llama 3 Instruct 8B0 wins
1 winsNova Micro

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3 Instruct 8B or Nova Micro?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Nova Micro wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Llama 3 Instruct 8B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Nova Micro generates tokens faster at 282 tok/s vs — tok/s. However, Nova Micro has lower time-to-first-token (0.87s vs —s).

When should I use Llama 3 Instruct 8B vs Nova Micro?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Nova Micro for stronger benchmark performance, and Nova Micro for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.