Compare/Llama 3 Instruct 8B vs Solar Mini

Llama 3 Instruct 8BvsSolar Mini

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Meta

Llama 3 Instruct 8B

Input
$0.04/M
Output
$0.14/M
Speed
TTFT
Upstage

Solar Mini

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.15/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Llama 3 Instruct 8B
Faster (tok/s)
Lower Latency
Benchmarks (0-1)
Solar Mini

Pricing Comparison

MetricLlama 3 Instruct 8BSolar Mini
Input ($/M tokens)$0.04$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0.14$0.15
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Llama 3 Instruct 8B$0.05
Solar Mini$0.16

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Solar Mini takes the aggregate benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 categories. Real workloads usually care about a handful of specific tasks — see the per-benchmark table above.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 0.9× the per-million-token cost, Llama 3 Instruct 8B is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Llama 3 Instruct 8B makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Llama 3 Instruct 8B is strongest on Intelligence Index (1.0). Solar Mini leads on Intelligence Index (6.0).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Meta and Upstage sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Meta tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Upstage often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Llama 3 Instruct 8B costs $3.30 ($40/year); Solar Mini costs $6.75 ($81/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Llama 3 Instruct 8B ≈ $0.48/run, Solar Mini ≈ $1.05/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Llama 3 Instruct 8B ≈ $22/run, Solar Mini ≈ $45/run. Llama 3 Instruct 8B becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
1.06.0
Coding Index
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Llama 3 Instruct 8B0 wins
1 winsSolar Mini

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3 Instruct 8B or Solar Mini?

Llama 3 Instruct 8B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.07/M tokens vs $0.15/M for Solar Mini.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Solar Mini wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Llama 3 Instruct 8B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Llama 3 Instruct 8B vs Solar Mini?

Choose based on your priorities: Llama 3 Instruct 8B for lower cost, Solar Mini for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.