Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 | Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.25 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $2 | $2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.69/M tokens vs $0.80/M for MiMo-V2-Omni-0327.
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 138 tok/s vs 110 tok/s. However, Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (1.09s vs 1.30s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.