Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.5 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $2 | $2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.80/M tokens vs $0.88/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct.
MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct generates tokens faster at 159 tok/s vs 110 tok/s. However, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has lower time-to-first-token (1.17s vs 1.30s).
Choose based on your priorities: MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 for lower cost, MiMo-V2-Omni-0327 for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.