Compare/Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Mistral Medium 3.5vsQwen3.7 Max

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Mistral

Mistral Medium 3.5

Input
$1.5/M
Output
$7.5/M
Speed
118 tok/s
TTFT
0.63s
Alibaba

Qwen3.7 Max

Input
$2.5/M
Output
$7.5/M
Speed
199 tok/s
TTFT
1.73s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Mistral Medium 3.5
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3.7 Max
Lower Latency
Mistral Medium 3.5
Benchmarks (0-7)
Qwen3.7 Max

Pricing Comparison

MetricMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.7 Max
Input ($/M tokens)$1.5$2.5
Output ($/M tokens)$7.5$7.5
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Mistral Medium 3.5$2.25
Qwen3.7 Max$3.25

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Mistral Medium 3.5
118 tok/s
Qwen3.7 Max
199 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Mistral Medium 3.5
0.63s
Qwen3.7 Max
1.73s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
39.256.6
Coding Index
35.450.1
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
74.8%92.3%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
12.8%38.1%
SciCode
39.6%48.8%
IFBench
68.8%80.5%
TerminalBench
33.3%50.8%
Mistral Medium 3.50 wins
7 winsQwen3.7 Max

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $3.00/M tokens vs $3.75/M for Qwen3.7 Max.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3.7 Max wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Mistral Medium 3.5. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3.7 Max generates tokens faster at 199 tok/s vs 118 tok/s. Mistral Medium 3.5 also has lower time-to-first-token (0.63s vs 1.73s).

When should I use Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max?

Choose based on your priorities: Mistral Medium 3.5 for lower cost, Qwen3.7 Max for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.7 Max for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.