Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning | GPT-5.4 nano (medium) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0 | $0.2 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0 | $1.25 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.46/M for GPT-5.4 nano (medium).
GPT-5.4 nano (medium) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GPT-5.4 nano (medium) generates tokens faster at 171 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 2.38s).
Choose based on your priorities: Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning for lower cost, GPT-5.4 nano (medium) for stronger benchmark performance, and GPT-5.4 nano (medium) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.