Advertisement
Compare/Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)

Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)vsGemini 3.8 Flash (high)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Meta

Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)

Input
$1.25/M
Output
$4.25/M
Speed
217 tok/s
TTFT
22.70s
Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)

Input
$0.75/M
Output
$3.75/M
Speed
303 tok/s
TTFT
16.28s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
Faster (tok/s)
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
Lower Latency
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
Benchmarks (2-0)
Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)

Pricing Comparison

MetricMuse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
Input ($/M tokens)$1.25$0.75
Output ($/M tokens)$4.25$3.75
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)$1.68
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)$1.13

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)
217 tok/s
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
303 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)
22.70s
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
16.28s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) wins the overall benchmark matchup 2–0 across 2 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Both models sit in the mid-tier / budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.1× the per-million-token cost, Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) is strongest on Coding Index (76.5), Intelligence Index (45.2). Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) leads on Coding Index (76.3), Intelligence Index (41.2).

Speed. On throughput, Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) generates tokens at 303 tok/s versus 217 tok/s — about 28% faster. On time-to-first-token, Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) responds in 16280ms vs 22700ms, which matters most for chat-style UIs.

Provider. Meta and Google sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Meta tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Google often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) costs $101.25 ($1215/year); Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) costs $78.75 ($945/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) ≈ $14.75/run, Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) ≈ $11.25/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) ≈ $675/run, Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) ≈ $525/run. Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Head-to-head deltas

  • Aggregate benchmark score (sum across 12 categories, capped at 100): Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) = 122, Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) = 118. Within 15% — effectively equivalent if both meet the threshold your product requires.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
45.241.2
Coding Index
76.576.3
Math Index
——
GPQA Diamond
——
MMLU-Pro
——
LiveCodeBench
——
AIME 2025
——
MATH-500
——
Humanity's Last Exam
——
SciCode
——
IFBench
——
TerminalBench
——
Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)2 wins
0 winsGemini 3.8 Flash (high)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) or Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)?

Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.50/M tokens vs $2.00/M for Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) wins 2 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Gemini 3.8 Flash (high). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) generates tokens faster at 303 tok/s vs 217 tok/s. However, Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) has lower time-to-first-token (16.28s vs 22.70s).

When should I use Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)?

Choose based on your priorities: Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) for lower cost, Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh) for stronger benchmark performance, and Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.