Advertisement
Compare/North Mini Code vs GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

North Mini CodevsGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Cohere

North Mini Code

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
84 tok/s
TTFT
0.40s
Z AI

GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.6/M
Output
$1.8/M
Speed
42 tok/s
TTFT
2.74s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
North Mini Code
Faster (tok/s)
North Mini Code
Lower Latency
North Mini Code
Benchmarks (2-0)
North Mini Code

Pricing Comparison

MetricNorth Mini CodeGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0.6
Output ($/M tokens)$0$1.8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
North Mini Code$0.00
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)$0.78

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
North Mini Code
84 tok/s
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
42 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
North Mini Code
0.40s
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
2.74s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. North Mini Code wins the overall benchmark matchup 2–0 across 2 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Pricing varies significantly between these models — check the table above for the exact per-token rates. Many production workloads actually surface input-token cost (retrieval-augmented prompts, code-context windows), so factor both directions.

Strengths. North Mini Code is strongest on Coding Index (36.5), Intelligence Index (12.8). GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) leads on Intelligence Index (6.7).

Speed. On throughput, North Mini Code generates tokens at 84 tok/s versus 42 tok/s — about 50% faster. On time-to-first-token, North Mini Code responds in 400ms vs 2740ms, which matters most for chat-style UIs.

Provider. Cohere and Z AI sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Cohere tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Z AI often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): North Mini Code costs $0.00 ($0/year); GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) costs $45.00 ($540/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): North Mini Code ≈ $0.00/run, GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) ≈ $6.60/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): North Mini Code ≈ $0/run, GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) ≈ $300/run. North Mini Code becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Head-to-head deltas

  • On throughput, North Mini Code is 2.01× faster (84 tok/s vs 42 tok/s). For streaming chat or real-time agents this alone often flips the recommendation.
  • Time-to-first-token differs by 6.9× — North Mini Code responds in 400ms vs 2740ms. For interactive chat UIs this can matter more than raw benchmark wins.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
12.86.7
Coding Index
36.5—
Math Index
——
GPQA Diamond
——
MMLU-Pro
——
LiveCodeBench
——
AIME 2025
——
MATH-500
——
Humanity's Last Exam
——
SciCode
——
IFBench
——
TerminalBench
——
North Mini Code2 wins
0 winsGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, North Mini Code or GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)?

North Mini Code is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.90/M for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

North Mini Code wins 2 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

North Mini Code generates tokens faster at 84 tok/s vs 42 tok/s. North Mini Code also has lower time-to-first-token (0.40s vs 2.74s).

When should I use North Mini Code vs GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: North Mini Code for lower cost, North Mini Code for stronger benchmark performance, and North Mini Code for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.