Compare/Nova Lite vs Granite 4.2 8B

Nova LitevsGranite 4.2 8B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Amazon

Nova Lite

Input
$0.06/M
Output
$0.24/M
Speed
173 tok/s
TTFT
0.93s
IBM

Granite 4.2 8B

Input
$0.06/M
Output
$0.25/M
Speed
144 tok/s
TTFT
0.62s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Nova Lite
Faster (tok/s)
Nova Lite
Lower Latency
Granite 4.2 8B
Benchmarks (0-2)
Granite 4.2 8B

Pricing Comparison

MetricNova LiteGranite 4.2 8B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.06$0.06
Output ($/M tokens)$0.24$0.25
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Nova Lite$0.08
Granite 4.2 8B$0.08

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Nova Lite
173 tok/s
Granite 4.2 8B
144 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Nova Lite
0.93s
Granite 4.2 8B
0.62s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Granite 4.2 8B takes the aggregate benchmark matchup 2–0 across 2 categories. Real workloads usually care about a handful of specific tasks — see the per-benchmark table above.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Nova Lite is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Nova Lite makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Nova Lite is strongest on Intelligence Index (6.7). Granite 4.2 8B leads on Coding Index (22.4), Intelligence Index (19.6).

Speed. Throughput is comparable — 173 tok/s vs 144 tok/s — so generation speed shouldn't drive your choice here. Look at the per-benchmark wins instead.

Provider. Amazon and IBM sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Amazon tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while IBM often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Nova Lite costs $5.40 ($65/year); Granite 4.2 8B costs $5.55 ($67/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Nova Lite ≈ $0.78/run, Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $0.80/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Nova Lite ≈ $36/run, Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $37/run. Nova Lite becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
6.719.6
Coding Index
22.4
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Nova Lite0 wins
2 winsGranite 4.2 8B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Nova Lite or Granite 4.2 8B?

Nova Lite is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.10/M tokens vs $0.11/M for Granite 4.2 8B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Granite 4.2 8B wins 2 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Nova Lite. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Nova Lite generates tokens faster at 173 tok/s vs 144 tok/s. However, Granite 4.2 8B has lower time-to-first-token (0.62s vs 0.93s).

When should I use Nova Lite vs Granite 4.2 8B?

Choose based on your priorities: Nova Lite for lower cost, Granite 4.2 8B for stronger benchmark performance, and Nova Lite for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.