Compare/Nova Micro vs Llama 3 Instruct 8B

Nova MicrovsLlama 3 Instruct 8B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Amazon

Nova Micro

Input
$0.04/M
Output
$0.14/M
Speed
282 tok/s
TTFT
0.87s
Meta

Llama 3 Instruct 8B

Input
$0.04/M
Output
$0.14/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Nova Micro
Lower Latency
Nova Micro
Benchmarks (1-0)
Nova Micro

Pricing Comparison

MetricNova MicroLlama 3 Instruct 8B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.04$0.04
Output ($/M tokens)$0.14$0.14
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Nova Micro$0.05
Llama 3 Instruct 8B$0.05

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Nova Micro
282 tok/s
Llama 3 Instruct 8B
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Nova Micro
0.87s
Llama 3 Instruct 8B

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Nova Micro wins the overall benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Llama 3 Instruct 8B is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Llama 3 Instruct 8B makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Nova Micro is strongest on Intelligence Index (4.4). Llama 3 Instruct 8B leads on Intelligence Index (1.0).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Amazon and Meta sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Amazon tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Meta often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Nova Micro costs $3.30 ($40/year); Llama 3 Instruct 8B costs $3.30 ($40/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Nova Micro ≈ $0.48/run, Llama 3 Instruct 8B ≈ $0.48/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Nova Micro ≈ $22/run, Llama 3 Instruct 8B ≈ $22/run.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
4.41.0
Coding Index
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Nova Micro1 wins
0 winsLlama 3 Instruct 8B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Nova Micro or Llama 3 Instruct 8B?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Nova Micro wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Llama 3 Instruct 8B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Nova Micro generates tokens faster at 282 tok/s vs — tok/s. Nova Micro also has lower time-to-first-token (0.87s vs —s).

When should I use Nova Micro vs Llama 3 Instruct 8B?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Nova Micro for stronger benchmark performance, and Nova Micro for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.