Compare/Nova Pro vs GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)

Nova ProvsGLM-5 (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Amazon

Nova Pro

Input
$0.8/M
Output
$3.2/M
Speed
TTFT
Z AI

GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)

Input
$1/M
Output
$3.2/M
Speed
40 tok/s
TTFT
1.62s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Nova Pro
Faster (tok/s)
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (0-1)
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricNova ProGLM-5 (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.8$1
Output ($/M tokens)$3.2$3.2
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Nova Pro$1.12
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)$1.32

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Nova Pro
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)
40 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Nova Pro
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)
1.62s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) takes the aggregate benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 categories. Real workloads usually care about a handful of specific tasks — see the per-benchmark table above.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Nova Pro is strongest on Intelligence Index (7.5). GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) leads on Intelligence Index (33.2).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Amazon and Z AI sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Amazon tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Z AI often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Nova Pro costs $72.00 ($864/year); GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) costs $78.00 ($936/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Nova Pro ≈ $10.40/run, GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) ≈ $11.40/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Nova Pro ≈ $480/run, GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) ≈ $520/run. Nova Pro becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
7.533.2
Coding Index
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Nova Pro0 wins
1 winsGLM-5 (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro or GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)?

Nova Pro is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.40/M tokens vs $1.55/M for GLM-5 (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Nova Pro. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 40 tok/s vs — tok/s. However, GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (1.62s vs —s).

When should I use Nova Pro vs GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Nova Pro for lower cost, GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.