Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning) | Agnes 3.0 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.04 | $0.05 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.16 | $0.15 |
Verdict. Agnes 3.0 Flash takes the aggregate benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 categories. Real workloads usually care about a handful of specific tasks — see the per-benchmark table above.
Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.1× the per-million-token cost, Agnes 3.0 Flash is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Agnes 3.0 Flash makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.
Strengths. NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning) is strongest on Intelligence Index (7.4). Agnes 3.0 Flash leads on Intelligence Index (35.5).
Speed. On throughput, Agnes 3.0 Flash generates tokens at 237 tok/s versus 95 tok/s — about 60% faster. On time-to-first-token, Agnes 3.0 Flash responds in 1840ms vs 7880ms, which matters most for chat-style UIs.
Provider. NVIDIA and Sapiens AI sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: NVIDIA tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Sapiens AI often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.
Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning) costs $3.60 ($43/year); Agnes 3.0 Flash costs $3.75 ($45/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning) ≈ $0.52/run, Agnes 3.0 Flash ≈ $0.55/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning) ≈ $24/run, Agnes 3.0 Flash ≈ $25/run. NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning) becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.
Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.
Head-to-head deltas
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.07/M tokens vs $0.07/M for Agnes 3.0 Flash.
Agnes 3.0 Flash wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Agnes 3.0 Flash generates tokens faster at 237 tok/s vs 95 tok/s. However, Agnes 3.0 Flash has lower time-to-first-token (1.84s vs 7.88s).
Choose based on your priorities: NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning) for lower cost, Agnes 3.0 Flash for stronger benchmark performance, and Agnes 3.0 Flash for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.