Compare/o1-pro vs Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)

o1-provsClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

OpenAI

o1-pro

Input
$150/M
Output
$600/M
Speed
TTFT
Anthropic

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)

Input
$15/M
Output
$75/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (0-10)
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

Metrico1-proClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$150$15
Output ($/M tokens)$600$75
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
o1-pro$210.00
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)$22.50

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
18.925.5
Coding Index
Math Index
36.3
GPQA Diamond
70.1%
MMLU-Pro
86.0%
LiveCodeBench
54.2%
AIME 2025
36.3%
MATH-500
94.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
5.9%
SciCode
40.9%
IFBench
43.3%
TerminalBench
o1-pro0 wins
10 winsClaude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)?

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $30.00/M tokens vs $262.50/M for o1-pro.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for o1-pro. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use o1-pro vs Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.