Compare/o1 vs Claude 3 Opus

o1vsClaude 3 Opus

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

OpenAI

o1

Input
$15/M
Output
$60/M
Speed
113 tok/s
TTFT
20.72s
Anthropic

Claude 3 Opus

Input
$15/M
Output
$75/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
o1
Faster (tok/s)
o1
Lower Latency
Claude 3 Opus
Benchmarks (10-0)
o1

Pricing Comparison

Metrico1Claude 3 Opus
Input ($/M tokens)$15$15
Output ($/M tokens)$60$75
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
o1$21.00
Claude 3 Opus$22.50

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
o1
113 tok/s
Claude 3 Opus
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
o1
20.72s
Claude 3 Opus

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
30.818.0
Coding Index
20.519.5
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
74.7%48.9%
MMLU-Pro
84.1%69.6%
LiveCodeBench
67.9%27.9%
AIME 2025
MATH-500
97.0%64.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
7.7%3.1%
SciCode
35.8%23.3%
IFBench
70.3%
TerminalBench
12.9%
o110 wins
0 winsClaude 3 Opus

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, o1 or Claude 3 Opus?

o1 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $26.25/M tokens vs $30.00/M for Claude 3 Opus.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o1 wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Claude 3 Opus. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o1 generates tokens faster at 113 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, Claude 3 Opus has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 20.72s).

When should I use o1 vs Claude 3 Opus?

Choose based on your priorities: o1 for lower cost, o1 for stronger benchmark performance, and o1 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.