Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.6 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $2.15 | $2.2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.84/M tokens vs $1.00/M for GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning).
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 97 tok/s vs 59 tok/s. However, GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.80s vs 1.18s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.