Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.2 | $0.35 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.825 | $0.85 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.36/M tokens vs $0.47/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Llama 4 Maverick. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 4 Maverick generates tokens faster at 114 tok/s vs 67 tok/s. However, Llama 4 Maverick has lower time-to-first-token (0.64s vs 1.26s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct for lower cost, Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 4 Maverick for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.