Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.5 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $3.2 | $3 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.10/M tokens vs $1.13/M for Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning).
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 180 tok/s vs 135 tok/s. Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (1.02s vs 6.33s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) for lower cost, Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.