Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3.5 2B (Reasoning) | LFM2 24B A2B |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.02 | $0.03 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.1 | $0.12 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 2B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.04/M tokens vs $0.05/M for LFM2 24B A2B.
LFM2 24B A2B wins 5 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for Qwen3.5 2B (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3.5 2B (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 357 tok/s vs 203 tok/s. However, LFM2 24B A2B has lower time-to-first-token (0.22s vs 0.54s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 2B (Reasoning) for lower cost, LFM2 24B A2B for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 2B (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.