Compare/Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) vs Ministral 3 8B

Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)vsMinistral 3 8B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)

Input
$0.03/M
Output
$0.15/M
Speed
225 tok/s
TTFT
0.29s
Mistral

Ministral 3 8B

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.15/M
Speed
176 tok/s
TTFT
0.31s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
Lower Latency
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
Benchmarks (6-5)
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)Ministral 3 8B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.03$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0.15$0.15
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)$0.04
Ministral 3 8B$0.16

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
225 tok/s
Ministral 3 8B
176 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
0.29s
Ministral 3 8B
0.31s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
27.114.8
Coding Index
17.510.0
Math Index
31.7
GPQA Diamond
77.1%47.1%
MMLU-Pro
64.2%
LiveCodeBench
30.3%
AIME 2025
31.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
7.8%4.3%
SciCode
16.1%20.8%
IFBench
52.0%29.1%
TerminalBench
18.2%4.5%
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)6 wins
5 winsMinistral 3 8B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) or Ministral 3 8B?

Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.06/M tokens vs $0.15/M for Ministral 3 8B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Ministral 3 8B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 225 tok/s vs 176 tok/s. Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.29s vs 0.31s).

When should I use Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) vs Ministral 3 8B?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.