Compare/Qwen3.5 Omni Flash vs Mercury 2

Qwen3.5 Omni FlashvsMercury 2

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3.5 Omni Flash

Input
$0.1/M
Output
$0.8/M
Speed
170 tok/s
TTFT
1.03s
Inception

Mercury 2

Input
$0.25/M
Output
$0.75/M
Speed
952 tok/s
TTFT
4.58s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Faster (tok/s)
Mercury 2
Lower Latency
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Benchmarks (0-7)
Mercury 2

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3.5 Omni FlashMercury 2
Input ($/M tokens)$0.1$0.25
Output ($/M tokens)$0.8$0.75
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash$0.18
Mercury 2$0.33

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
170 tok/s
Mercury 2
952 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
1.03s
Mercury 2
4.58s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
25.932.8
Coding Index
14.030.6
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
74.2%77.0%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
7.1%15.5%
SciCode
25.5%38.7%
IFBench
38.0%69.8%
TerminalBench
8.3%26.5%
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash0 wins
7 winsMercury 2

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 Omni Flash or Mercury 2?

Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.28/M tokens vs $0.38/M for Mercury 2.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Mercury 2 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Qwen3.5 Omni Flash. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Mercury 2 generates tokens faster at 952 tok/s vs 170 tok/s. Qwen3.5 Omni Flash also has lower time-to-first-token (1.03s vs 4.58s).

When should I use Qwen3.5 Omni Flash vs Mercury 2?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 Omni Flash for lower cost, Mercury 2 for stronger benchmark performance, and Mercury 2 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.