Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $4.8 | $5 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.50/M tokens vs $2.00/M for Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning).
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for Qwen3.5 Omni Plus. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 104 tok/s vs 50 tok/s. Qwen3.5 Omni Plus also has lower time-to-first-token (1.35s vs 11.97s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 Omni Plus for lower cost, Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.