Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $2.5 | $1.5 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $7.5 | $7.5 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $3.00/M tokens vs $3.75/M for Qwen3.7 Max.
Qwen3.7 Max wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Mistral Medium 3.5. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3.7 Max generates tokens faster at 201 tok/s vs 97 tok/s. However, Mistral Medium 3.5 has lower time-to-first-token (0.69s vs 1.57s).
Choose based on your priorities: Mistral Medium 3.5 for lower cost, Qwen3.7 Max for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.7 Max for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.