Compare/Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiniMax-M2.7

Qwen3.7 PlusvsMiniMax-M2.7

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3.7 Plus

Input
$0.4/M
Output
$1.16/M
Speed
54 tok/s
TTFT
1.34s
MiniMax

MiniMax-M2.7

Input
$0.3/M
Output
$1.2/M
Speed
68 tok/s
TTFT
2.62s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
MiniMax-M2.7
Faster (tok/s)
MiniMax-M2.7
Lower Latency
Qwen3.7 Plus
Benchmarks (6-1)
Qwen3.7 Plus

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3.7 PlusMiniMax-M2.7
Input ($/M tokens)$0.4$0.3
Output ($/M tokens)$1.16$1.2
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.52
MiniMax-M2.7$0.42

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3.7 Plus
54 tok/s
MiniMax-M2.7
68 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3.7 Plus
1.34s
MiniMax-M2.7
2.62s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
53.349.6
Coding Index
46.541.9
Math Index
——
GPQA Diamond
90.0%87.4%
MMLU-Pro
——
LiveCodeBench
——
AIME 2025
——
MATH-500
——
Humanity's Last Exam
33.4%28.1%
SciCode
45.5%47.0%
IFBench
78.0%75.7%
TerminalBench
47.0%39.4%
Qwen3.7 Plus6 wins
1 winsMiniMax-M2.7

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.53/M tokens vs $0.59/M for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3.7 Plus wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for MiniMax-M2.7. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

MiniMax-M2.7 generates tokens faster at 68 tok/s vs 54 tok/s. Qwen3.7 Plus also has lower time-to-first-token (1.34s vs 2.62s).

When should I use Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiniMax-M2.7?

Choose based on your priorities: MiniMax-M2.7 for lower cost, Qwen3.7 Plus for stronger benchmark performance, and MiniMax-M2.7 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.

More Comparisons

← All comparisons·Full benchmark table·Cost calculator