Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.2 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.16 | $1.15 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.44/M tokens vs $0.59/M for Qwen3.7 Plus.
Qwen3.7 Plus wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Step 3.7 Flash. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Step 3.7 Flash generates tokens faster at 403 tok/s vs 54 tok/s. However, Step 3.7 Flash has lower time-to-first-token (0.79s vs 1.34s).
Choose based on your priorities: Step 3.7 Flash for lower cost, Qwen3.7 Plus for stronger benchmark performance, and Step 3.7 Flash for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.