Compare/Qwen3 Max vs Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24)

Qwen3 MaxvsMistral Large 2 (Jul '24)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3 Max

Input
$1.2/M
Output
$6/M
Speed
58 tok/s
TTFT
2.27s
Mistral

Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24)

Input
$2/M
Output
$6/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3 Max
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3 Max
Lower Latency
Qwen3 Max
Benchmarks (1-0)
Qwen3 Max

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3 MaxMistral Large 2 (Jul '24)
Input ($/M tokens)$1.2$2
Output ($/M tokens)$6$6
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3 Max$1.80
Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24)$2.60

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3 Max
58 tok/s
Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24)
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3 Max
2.27s
Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24)

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Qwen3 Max wins the overall benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Both models sit in the mid-tier bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24) is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24) makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Qwen3 Max is strongest on Intelligence Index (24.5). Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24) leads on Intelligence Index (7.0).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. Alibaba and Mistral sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Alibaba tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Mistral often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Qwen3 Max costs $126.00 ($1512/year); Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24) costs $150.00 ($1800/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Qwen3 Max ≈ $18.00/run, Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24) ≈ $22.00/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Qwen3 Max ≈ $840/run, Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24) ≈ $1000/run. Qwen3 Max becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
24.57.0
Coding Index
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Qwen3 Max1 wins
0 winsMistral Large 2 (Jul '24)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Max or Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24)?

Qwen3 Max is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $2.40/M tokens vs $3.00/M for Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3 Max wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3 Max generates tokens faster at 58 tok/s vs — tok/s. Qwen3 Max also has lower time-to-first-token (2.27s vs —s).

When should I use Qwen3 Max vs Mistral Large 2 (Jul '24)?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 Max for lower cost, Qwen3 Max for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 Max for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.