Compare/QwQ 32B vs GLM-4.5-Air

QwQ 32BvsGLM-4.5-Air

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

QwQ 32B

Input
$0.66/M
Output
$1/M
Speed
31 tok/s
TTFT
0.47s
Z AI

GLM-4.5-Air

Input
$0.17/M
Output
$0.98/M
Speed
63 tok/s
TTFT
1.66s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
GLM-4.5-Air
Faster (tok/s)
GLM-4.5-Air
Lower Latency
QwQ 32B
Benchmarks (3-9)
GLM-4.5-Air

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwQ 32BGLM-4.5-Air
Input ($/M tokens)$0.66$0.17
Output ($/M tokens)$1$0.98
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
QwQ 32B$0.76
GLM-4.5-Air$0.27

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
QwQ 32B
31 tok/s
GLM-4.5-Air
63 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
QwQ 32B
0.47s
GLM-4.5-Air
1.66s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
19.723.2
Coding Index
23.8
Math Index
29.080.7
GPQA Diamond
59.3%73.3%
MMLU-Pro
76.4%81.5%
LiveCodeBench
63.1%68.4%
AIME 2025
29.0%80.7%
MATH-500
95.7%96.5%
Humanity's Last Exam
8.2%6.8%
SciCode
35.8%30.6%
IFBench
38.8%37.6%
TerminalBench
20.5%
QwQ 32B3 wins
9 winsGLM-4.5-Air

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QwQ 32B or GLM-4.5-Air?

GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.37/M tokens vs $0.74/M for QwQ 32B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GLM-4.5-Air wins 9 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for QwQ 32B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

GLM-4.5-Air generates tokens faster at 63 tok/s vs 31 tok/s. QwQ 32B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.47s vs 1.66s).

When should I use QwQ 32B vs GLM-4.5-Air?

Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.5-Air for lower cost, GLM-4.5-Air for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.5-Air for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.